Publication
Innovation, open innovation and intellectual property rights: firm size differences. SOTA No 21
Published: 19 February 2019
ERC SOTA No 21
Authors
Associated Themes
- Innovation
With growing interaction among firms in the innovation process, the need for efficient protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) also increases. The high costs and lengthy processes associated with patenting call for firms to use other methods of protecting their intellectual property (IP). The low costs and high revenues associated with the use of trademarks entice the adoption of this measure. For SMEs however, recent evidence questions the long-term benefits of trademarks, and suggests that industrial designs may be a more efficient form of IP protection. There is little evidence for or against using copyright, possibly due to difficulties in measuring this IPR. As product cycles are shortening, firms increasingly protect IP through speed-to-market and secrecy. However, more research is needed as to how secrecy relates to more formal methods of IP protection.
Downloads
Related publications
Assessing the impact of Covid-19 on Innovate UK award holders, Wave 3. February 2021
ERC / Innovation Caucus Research Report
Published: 22 March 2021
About
Our Work
People
News & Events
Contact
Enterprise Research Centre
Warwick Business School
University of Warwick
Coventry CV4 7AL
Enterprise Research Centre
Aston Business School
Aston University
Birmingham B4 7ET
0121 204 5392
[email protected]